|
What happens on the jeep a. What was the position of the men on the jeep? The photos we have analysed highlight a series of incongruent details. In all the photos we possess which are shot up to the moment when the first shot was fired the man who is shooting is on the right-hand side of the Defender, whilst there is no-one on the left. b. The other man, or the other two men, must be on the right-hand side as well or on the floor of the vehicle. If we analyse Ricci's video carefully, however, one may note that the second shot was fired from a pistol which is sticking out of the left-hand side of the rear window. The flash from the first shot also lights up the small window on the left of the jeep. c. Thus there are two different possibilities regarding who actually fired the shots: if the same person shot both bullets, then he must have shot the first on the right-hand side of the vehicle and then moved to the left. The other option is that two different people opened fire with an interval of a couple of seconds between the shots. If the first hypothesis is correct this would demonstrate a cold-bloodedness and a level of experience which Placanica, who asserts he panicked, cannot have possessed and demonstrated in those moments. If the second hypothesis is correct, on the other hand, then it is no longer obvious that Placanica fired the first shot [the one which actually killed Carlo]. We can doubt that Placanica fired the first shot without even having to decide whether the man holding his head with his hand in Asch's close-up is Placanica or not. The angle from which the film is shot could have distorted our perception of the side(s) from which the shots were fired, but what appears to be evident if the same man shot both bullets is that the latter was a skilled shooter who could shoot whilst moving from one position to another to defend himself and who was able to choose the best angle to fire. The second shot, on the other hand, appears to have been fired at random, so as to be able to assert after the events that he had to shoot Carlo after his first shot into the air had been ignored. b)
1. Placanica's statement (Data)( 3. Monai insists that he hit a carabiniere who was sitting in the back seat facing the crowd behind the vehicle in the chest, but this is not plausible. The wooden plank enters the jeep at such an angle that this could only have happened if the man who was allegedly hit by Monai had been sitting just behind the driver's seat on the left-hand side of the Defender with his chest facing the window which Monai hit with the plank, but, from the photos I have analysed, there is no-one sitting in that position. Carta [a left-wing magazine] asserts that Monai declared, when interviewed, that he hit a carabiniere on the head repeatedly. I think Carta's version is the most plausible. Thus, if the only carabiniere who suffered a head injury was Placanica, Placanica cannot be responsible for the shots as he was sitting between the man who was actually shooting and the jeep's front seats, in the centre of the right-hand side of the jeep. e. To synthesise: there appear to be three men in the back seats of the jeep, Placanica, Raffone and another mysterious carabiniere. Placanica is sitting on the right-hand side of the vehicle and he is leaning towards the front seats with his face towards the rear window. He does not move from this position and is hit repeatedly by Monai. Raffone is lying on the floor of the jeep and Placanica protects him from Monai's plank by shielding him with his body. At the beginning "Mister X" is sitting near Placanica on the right-hand side, on the seat nearest the rear door of the jeep, but he then moves rapidly (and in a way which seems to highlight the fact that he is somewhat experienced) to the left where he shoots twice, once from the inside of the vehicle and once actually holding the pistol out of the rear window.
|